- This topic has 80 replies, 13 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 7 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Hi Gareth/Alan,
Yes the steps above are how its done. I would add that I have noticed that certain hardware can be different so its a good quick and easy test for anyone new to do to optimize for themselves. I personally do get benefit from more that 3 reactors but it is diminishing returns. The main reason I run more is just because I run each on a different symbol. Its good to have an understanding of all this so the user knows how best to optimize depedning on what they are doing.
For example if you were just developing strategies for 1-3 pairs then it would be pointless to try to run more reactors (and in some cases would be slower as it is on one of my computers).
Hello everyone,
logged with my credentials on https://studio.eatradingacademy.com/ it does not generate any strategy.
If I open a session in incognito mode, instead, it works!!
Very strange, please help thanks!
Angelo
Hi Alan/Samuel,
I was testing generating strategies in Internet Explorer and found that it was generating a lot more strategies and faster compared to Chrome.
Both have been updated to the latest version so I was surprised to see IE was a lot faster when I set the test and measured it for a full hour by generating 10 0000 more strategies than the Chrome version.
Hi Gareth,
Interesting! According to the EA Studio About tab the developer says Internet Explorer is not supported and will not work!
Alan,
I was surprised too, with 4 tabs open on IE it is generating between 15 000 and 20 000 strategies per hour. There is nothing else open or running on the PC. I will leave them running overnight to see the total result.
Hi, I’m thinking whether the methodology is ok?
In top 10 robots, the average balance growth is about 1.4x in 5 years, which means about 8% simple rate per annual. I think such return is below my expectation.
For the industry, I think the average return should be lower than 8%. However, for top performers, I think the 8% compound rate per annual could be the median (my gut feeling).
That caused my thinking, whether the methodology (i.e. relying on EA studio to generate strategies, testing them, selecting them, creating portfolio, demo account then live account) works or not?
Otherwise, I run the trial version for couple of days for EURUSD and XAUUSD, with (1) risk factor above 1.2x; (2) fixed SL 10-1,000 pips. Less satisfied strategy (actually none) was generated. For EURUSD, 5-year mark up was about 1.02 (deposit 10,000, 200 return). For XAUUSD, 5-yr mark up was about 1.10 (deposit 10,000, 1,000 return). I wonder whether my criteria is workable or not.
Combining the trial and 10 top robots performance, I am confused what I am doing is workable or not.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.