- This topic has 286 replies, 38 voices, and was last updated 1 year, 6 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
I stay with 20% OOS, I am not sure if there is a huge difference between 20% and 30%…maybe if the data is smaller it is good to use 20%. Anyway, we would have too small data to generate the EAs.
And yes, good we have Petko! He changes my trading it total. First I realized from the Forum that I was scammed last year, then I learned how to trade by myself and not to depend on anyone, and now he keeps improving my trading with all updates and new courses.
@Haliffa – Agreed, Petko is a huge asset!
I personally like the 20% OOS, it simulates the most recent market conditions (I mainly trade H1) so for me 20% is about a year and a half worth of data. Then i verify the OOS with the most current 6 months of data that I’ve kept with Data Horizon. It’s all about personal preference 🙂
Hello Roman,
yes indeed it is a personal choice but the great thing with OOS is exactly that we are able to test the EAs on the recent months. And it happens automatically with the Reactor which is really awesome!
Hello, guys, recently we had an update with the EA Studio which combines the OOS and the Walk forward. I will do my best to record a video about it until the end of the week.
Hello Jacpin,
thank you very much for sharing. Yes, I saw that videos but I tried generating with the win/loss of 0.7 and I did not get any strategies. Now it makes sense to me.
I saw that you follow the results, and you keep the EA if it makes 7 of 10 profitable, right? What is the SL is higher than the TP. If we have 7 profitable with small TP and 3 negative with bigger SL, isn’t that going to be a losing EA?
@jacpin2002 – thanks for sharing all of that. It sounds you already know your system and you know what you are doing and what you need to do. That is lovely. One last question 🙂 How long time normally one EA stays on a live account with this management of 7 out of 10?
@Jacpin – I’m very happy to hear your results! You always give me hope LOL. Trying to get my stats to improve, so far the best strategy i have is one Petko released in one of his courses back in September last year :/. Very curious though, with such performance you’ve been getting what’s kind of tp and sl range are you using in the generators?
Hello Jacpin,
I succeed to create EAs so far that last for no more than 5 weeks. So I guess this is the thing we need to look for – longer successful performance. This way the longer the EAs last, the less work we will do. At the end of the day, this is why we are at Expert Advisors 🙂 And what do you mean by tighter performance? Why are you looking for SL closer to the TP?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.